BBQHQThe world of cooking over fire

Comparisons · Two cuts

Salmon fillet or Tuna steak

Two oily fish of similar thickness and completely different serving conventions, and the pair where BBQHQ has to be careful: one is timed from a published rate and the other is conventionally served at a doneness no food authority endorses. The page says which is which rather than averaging them.

What each one is

Salmon fillet

A fatty fish with delicate muscle structure, which fails in the opposite direction from meat: it falls apart rather than toughening.

Tuna steak

A dense steak of dark muscle, very commonly served rare in the middle — which puts the culinary endpoint and the safety endpoint further apart than for any other fish.

What actually differs

Differences between Salmon fillet and Tuna steak
AspectSalmon filletTuna steak
Typical weight120–220 g150–250 g
Typical thickness

Thickness governs timing more than weight or cut name does — Weber's own chart roughly triples the time between a one-inch and a two-inch steak.

20–35 mm20–30 mm
What BBQHQ's evidence gives for time

Windows from the cooking profiles, at the conditions each profile states. They are not comparable to the minute — the profiles differ in cooker and configuration — and are shown to give the scale.

10–12 minutes6–12 minutes
How it is usually cookeddirect heat, two-zone firedirect heat
What tends to go wrong

From BBQHQ's troubleshooting index. Choosing between two cuts is partly choosing which failure you would rather risk.

came out dry, stuck to the grate, caused flare-ups, fell apartcame out dry

Can one stand in for the other?

Not a substitute for this

BBQHQ does not treat these as substitutes. They want different methods, and swapping them without changing the cook is how one of them comes out badly.

Food safety — read this first

This swap changes the safe endpoint

These are different food forms — fillet and steak — and form governs the safe endpoint rather than species. Do not carry a temperature across this swap; check the endpoint for the one you are actually cooking.

Where to go next

We’d like to measure which pages help, using anonymous analytics with no personal data and no search terms. Declining changes nothing about the site.