BBQHQThe world of cooking over fire

Sources

Food Standards Scotland

Cooking food safely — consumer advice

What this source is

Authority
Official guidance
Territories
GB-SCT
Primacy
primary
Commercial interest
none
Retrieved
2026-08-14
State
Read and citable

Original document

The record that turned a hold-scoping gap into a jurisdiction correction. Scotland's national food body gives consumers a single core temperature — 'When inserted in the thickest part of the food, the thermometer should read 75°C or above' — where the FSA gives 70 °C held for two minutes and a ladder of equivalents. Two authorities inside one state, publishing different advice, and BBQHQ had been giving Scottish readers the English figure. It states no resting guidance.

What it may be cited for

Safety, Technical

  • Explicitly not culinary practice: A food body sets safety thresholds. Food Standards Scotland does not publish guidance on how food should taste, and citing it for that would borrow authority it has not claimed.

What we recorded from it

  • When inserted in the thickest part of the food, the thermometer should read 75°C or above.

    Food Standards Scotland advises consumers that a thermometer inserted in the thickest part of the food should read 75 °C or above, and that minced meat products such as burgers, sausages and kebabs must be cooked thoroughly all the way through.

    Safety regime:
    Consumer guidance, addressed to people cooking at home.
    Where it applies:
    Scotland.
    A single core temperature where the FSA publishes 70 °C held for two minutes plus a ladder of equivalents. Two food bodies in one state giving different consumer advice, and neither is in error — the same shape as the FSA/USDA/MPI divergence the safety model was built around, arriving inside the United Kingdom.
    The page states no resting guidance.

Claims resting on it

  • In Scotland, Food Standards Scotland advises consumers that food is adequately cooked when a thermometer in the thickest part reads 75 °C or above.

If this source changes, these are the claims that need rechecking. That is the point of recording provenance per claim rather than per page.

We’d like to measure which pages help, using anonymous analytics with no personal data and no search terms. Declining changes nothing about the site.