BBQHQThe world of cooking over fire

Cuts · US butchery

Lamb rib chops

IMPS items 1204B to 1204F, cut from the rack. The cut a British butcher calls a cutlet, and a different item number from the loin chop it is routinely confused with.

Known as

The same muscle carries different names in different butchery systems, and some of those names mean different cuts elsewhere. Where a name is ambiguous, BBQHQ says so rather than picking one.

United States
  • Lamb rib chops
  • Frenched rib chop

    IMPS 1204C, the frenched variant.

  • Ribeye chop

    The URMIS common name for the cap-off variants 1204D and 1204F.

What to ask a butcher for

  • United States: A single rib chop off the rack with the bone scraped clean — a cutlet, in Britain.

Where it comes from on the animal

  • Lamb loin and rack

    Back · low use · connective tissue: low

    The back muscle, sold as loin chops with the bone or as cutlets from the rack. Tender, quick, and the cut AHDB gives grilling times for by thickness.

    Muscles: Longissimus dorsi

Asking a butcher for it

Named the way us butchery names it. If the counter does not recognise the name, the anatomy is the fallback: ask for the cut by where it comes from.

What to say
Lamb rib chops, or Frenched rib chop (US) depending where you are.
If that draws a blank
Ask for back — the muscle is Longissimus dorsi.
What to specify
Thickness, which governs the timing more than weight does — the usual range is 20–30 mm. Typical weight is 70–130 g.

What it is suited to

Derived from how hard the muscle works and how much connective tissue it carries, which is the pairing that decides whether a cut wants a fire under it or beside it. BBQHQ does not rank cuts and does not name a best one.

  • Low connective tissue: there is nothing here that a long cook would improve. Direct or two-zone heat, taken off at a doneness rather than at a texture, and every extra minute past that point costs moisture.
  • A supporting muscle that does little work, so it is tender to begin with and has nothing to gain from time.

What to use instead

A substitute is not the same as an equivalent. These are graded, because “yes, use that instead” is the answer that ruins dinners: most real substitutions work only once something about the cook changes.

  • Lamb loin chop

    Workable, once you change the cook

    What Britain calls a lamb cutlet. Filed against the British loin chop record because that is where AHDB's cutlet alias lives, and marked 'approximate' rather than 'overlapping' because the two are cut from different primals — the rack here, the loin there — and share no muscle boundary, only a cooking behaviour and a shape.

    • Cut from the rack (IMPS 204 series), not the loin. The British record it maps to is a loin chop, and the correspondence is with that record's 'cutlet' alias rather than with the record's own cut.
    • IMPS 1204C is frenched — the bone scraped clean. British cutlets are commonly sold frenched too, but AHDB specifies no trim.

Asking for it in another country

  • UK butchery: Closest available

    Lamb loin chop

    What Britain calls a lamb cutlet. Filed against the British loin chop record because that is where AHDB's cutlet alias lives, and marked 'approximate' rather than 'overlapping' because the two are cut from different primals — the rack here, the loin there — and share no muscle boundary, only a cooking behaviour and a shape.

    What differs

    • Cut from the rack (IMPS 204 series), not the loin. The British record it maps to is a loin chop, and the correspondence is with that record's 'cutlet' alias rather than with the record's own cut.
    • IMPS 1204C is frenched — the bone scraped clean. British cutlets are commonly sold frenched too, but AHDB specifies no trim.

The UK side of these mappings rests on AHDB’s published cutting specifications, which BBQHQ has read. The US side does not: USDA’s Institutional Meat Purchase Specifications and the Beef Checkoff cut pages both refuse automated access, so no mapping here reaches “same cut” across two butchery systems. See the open question.

Typical size

70–130 g

We’d like to measure which pages help, using anonymous analytics with no personal data and no search terms. Declining changes nothing about the site.